Peltier: “legally privileged and confidential,” Birthday note & another “reorganization”

Dear Supporters:

First, Peltier writes himself another birthday note to his thinning supporters. As he says, he has “a lot of time to reflect,” and did offer two thoughtful sentiments; being thankful for those who have recognized the injustices that have been perpetrated against indigenous peoples (can’t argue with that), and to acknowledge your own mother on your birthday for giving you life and suggesting that if a woman has four children she should have four Mother’s Days. An inspirational thought…and certainly not an original one with Peltier. 

In his own circumstance he laments that once incarcerated “family, relatives and friends are attentive on some level but as time goes on, it’s almost as if you had died and are only remembered on certain occasions.”  Guess that says a lot.

He talks of “improprieties” in his case but omits that there were really only two; one was unrelated to his conviction (but to his denial of parole), and the other (a ‘footnote’ in the court’s decision), was finally settled by the Canadian Government. Please see Editorial Essay #45

http://www.noparolepeltier.com/debate.html#review

He talks of the “adrenaline flow” of being involved in a movement and “a satisfaction in doing the right thing.” “The right thing,” evidentially, like standing over two dead agent’s mutilated bodies, stealing their weapons and does he remember when Joe “Killsright” Stuntz took Coler’s FBI jacket out of the trunk , put it on and gave him a smile? Probably so, because that’s what Peltier told Matthiessen.

The LPDOC announced yet another reorganization and admitted, “his defense committee has changed many times. People have come for a few months or even a few years and done wonderful work, but in time they are forced by life’s realities to move on.” Life’s realities? It goes a bit deeper than that, and following the “committee” for the past twelve and a half years it’s apparent the reality is that people can tolerate Peltier for just so long; his supporters, his committee and even his lawyers can endure just so much of his incessant, self-absorbed bullying. Let alone the insider comments that he may have gone stir-crazy. The infighting and power struggles were even shared with supporters who no doubt tired of the lack of leadership and focus. It’s all about “me.” Just ask Leonard, he’ll tell you straight out as he cowers behind a proud First American heritage he hijacked, diminished and adulterated. It helps though, as many envious inmates would agree, the attention Peltier gets makes ‘the passage of time’ a little less burdensome.

* * *

NOTICE: The information contained in this electronic message is legally privileged and confidential under applicable law, and is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hearby notified that any dissemination, copying or disclosure of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the LP-DOC by replying to this message. Immediately thereafter, delete this communication without copying or distributing it.

That was at the end of yet another LPDOC plea for funds for another new campaign, a plea that no longer claims to be “tax-exempt.” (Gee, wonder why? Maybe the IRS’s attention was drawn to certain unlawful fundraising practices? http://www.noparolepeltier.com/debate.html#fraud), but it still uses PayPal in violation of PayPal’s own “acceptable use” policy. A plea for money that also provides Dotty Ninham’s (920-713-8114) and Gina Buenrostro’s (920-713-2205) personal cell phone numbers! Shall we call them? Nah.

(See the Addendum for a slip of the tongue by Ms. Ninham.)

But let’s give this bizarre NOTICE a little scrutiny because it raises some serious flags about what’s really happening behind the wizard’s curtain in Fargo.

So where’s the logic and what does “legally privileged and confidential under applicable law” mean anyway? Are they that paranoid in Fargo? Well, maybe; that’s why they won’t let the NPPA on their email list, yet the NPPA, on the home page since day-one, April 30, 2000 provides a link to Peltier’s website (a link that has been updated several times as the “committee” morphed or shapeshifted).

So why can’t they trust their own supporters? Could it possibly be there are Peltier supporters who are on the fence about his claims of innocence? A good bet for sure. And whoa to those who are not the intended recipient, they are “hereby” (sounds awfully legalese) threatened “that any dissemination, copying or disclosure of this communication is strictly (yes, strictly) prohibited.”

Well then, here it is—disseminated—that Peltier is once again begging for money…money he has never accounted for in spite of forceful public pleas from his own people that “transparency regarding accounting and decisions will be posted on the web.”  That was in 2003 but it never happened. The LPDC, LPDOC and Peltier have kept this dirty little secret—secret—for a very long time. Weak-kneed supporters are either too blind or intimidated to ask Peltier and the LPDOC the honest and hard questions.

Their message also demands “NOTE: Please delete text from this point down before forwarding our announcements along to friends and family.”

“To friends and family?” What message are they really sending? Which begs an essential question:

What do they have to hide?

If the LPDOC’s rhetoric of a wrongful conviction is valid and Peltier’s laments of innocence have any validity, why not spread the word further? They don’t because Peltier’s claims are not supported by the facts, nor by his own many incriminating public statements. That’s why every argument with Peltier supporters always segues into the ether of fable or strays from the real truth and evidence of his guilt.  All this then just accumulates into the ongoing Myth of Leonard Peltier as some sort of legitimate hero to his people.*

All of Peltier’s arguments and excuses (in one specific appeal and elsewhere) “fail because they are fatally flawed.”**

All that remains is but a reflection, an image of Peltier; that of an incorrigible, unremorseful and unrepentant murderer because as he said, “And really, if necessary, I’d do it all over again, because it was the right thing to do.”***  And, as he already acknowledged in another instance, he’s guilty whether he “pulled the trigger or not.”****

Yes, Peltier and the LPDOC have a lot to hide, embarrassingly manifested with not so veiled threats for anyone to stray from their own version of the facts and the hidden message that no one should challenge this fabricated account lest they find the real truth of Peltier’s guilt.

No is the answer, no clemency for Peltier, he doesn’t deserve it nor has he earned it through his heinous criminal acts and nearly four decades of lies.

However, his day of reckoning will arrive as he faces the Creator, when he will finally be held accountable for his actions.

At that point the folklore will be meaningless.

“In the Spirit of Coler and Williams”

Ed Woods

* http://www.noparolepeltier.com/myth.html

** http://www.noparolepeltier.com/997.html

     http://www.noparolepeltier.com/debate.html#13

***  http://www.noparolepeltier.com/debate.html#confession

**** http://www.noparolepeltier.com/debate.html#right

Addendum:

Dorothy Ninham: “He’s guilty of the crimes he’s convicted of.” Yes, she actually said that. Thanks to an astute NPPA board member who picked up on this not so subtle slip of the tongue. During an interview on 7/20/11, Ms. Ninham, at 3:24 into the interview actually said that Leonard is “guilty of the crimes he’s convicted of.” Wonder what was really going on in her mind? Does she have doubts about Leonard’s claims of innocence? Probably not; more likely just a slip of the forked tongues from the LPDOC camp. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NPYm0c5a5X0

PELTIER...Prove it....Or it's just another lie

Dear Supporters:

On Peltier’s website (under ‘publications’) is a tri-fold brochure that can be downloaded and used as a propaganda tool to convince the uninformed about the plight of Leonard Peltier. The brochure (updated, June 26, 2010…an inauspicious 35^th anniversary date) is typical LPDOC boilerplate, but two bullet-points (no pun intended) stand out beyond the rest of the tired rhetoric:

“Years later, through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit, it was documented that:

● the FBI had been closely surveilling AIM activities on & off the reservations & had even been preparing for “paramilitary law enforcement operations” on Pine Ridge one month before the shootout.

● the two agents had possessed a map that highlighted the Jumping bull Ranch & labeled the family’s storage cellars as “bunkers.” (Minor correction; it was a farm, not a ranch.)

The first point was repudiated long ago; please see NPPA Editorial Essay #35, http://www.noparolepeltier.com/debate.html#critic

“Possessed a map?”

PELTIER SUPPORTERS (exclusive, of course, of the incorrigible and rabid followers who refuse to be either civil or confused by the facts*) need take a moment to consider how significant “the two agents had possessed a map” would have been to Peltier’s defense. Try adding just an ounce of common sense with a sprinkling of logic and really examine this (outrageous) claim.

If…and this is an incredibly major IF…this were factual, then all…yes, all, of Peltier’s claims of a wrongful conviction would have been, by default, validated:

I am guilty of only being an Indian. I can’t believe that the FBI intended the deaths of their own agents…nor does it jibe with the fact that scores, even hundreds, of FBI agents, federal marshals, BIA police, and GOONS were all lying in wait in the immediate vicinity. It seems they thought they’d barge in on that phony pretext, draw some show of resistance from our AIM spiritual camp, then pounce on the compound with massive force. I could smell the wonderful smell of those pancakes and…cupfuls of scalding hot black coffee. But suddenly this beautiful morning was cut short by the staccato sound of gunfire. Were we surrounded and about to be slaughtered? I fired off a few shots above their heads, not trying to hit anything or anyone, just to show that we had some kind of defense…unannounced interlopers who had come roaring onto Jumping bull property without warning…we realized that the drivers of the two shiny cars were apparently already dead, slouched besides their vehicles in pools of blood. I didn’t see their agents die, hand no hand in it. (And, certainly, from the film Incident at Oglala), “This story is true” Peltier opines for the camera, confirming Robideau’s story of someone they all knew, Mr. X, who had driven to Jumping Bull that day in the infamous red pickup to deliver dynamite to the camp and who then engaged the agents, shot them both dead and drove off into the distance.** (Of course, Dino Butler called both Robideau and Peltier liars on that story). And there’s certainly a lot more.

If “the two agents had possessed a map,” it would have been jumped on at every opportunity by the defense team to support Peltier’s version of events and his alleged innocence. It would have been the proverbial “smoking gun” countering the government’s case against Peltier. It would have been his ticket to freedom.

(Of course the FOIA material was after-the-fact, after the trial, so it’s no surprise to anyone that nowhere in the 3,343 pages and over a million words of trial transcript that the word bunker(s) is ever mentioned.)

So where did this incredible “fact” (read, actually ‘fiction’) come from?

For Peltier follower’s sake, let’s dig a little deeper.

In the Spirit of Crazy Horse (1992): Matthiessen mentions “cellar” twice, “storage” four times but each in the context of what they really are, no references at all to Agents Coler and Williams possessing a map of Jumping Bull. Nope, not there.

Prison Writings, My life is my sun dance (1999): Peltier’s ninth-grade-level reader makes many allegations but never mentions “the two agents had possessed a map.” Nope, not there.

Court decisions and appeals:

„ Direct appeal, United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit, 9/14/78: Nope, not there, but the Court did state “The direct and circumstantial evidence of Peltier’s guilt was strong…”

„ § 2255 Motion for a new trial, United States District Court, 12/29/82: Nope, not there, but the Court did state: “It is noted that the defense utilized during the trial the services of nine attorneys, many of which were vastly experienced in criminal defense.”

„ § 2255 Motion based on newly discovered evidence (Freedom of Information and Privacy Act), District Court, 12/30/82: Nope, not there, but the Court did state: “Petitioner was tried, however, on the theory that he was guilty of aiding and abetting in the murders of the agents.”

„ Appeal from the District Court Ruling; Eighth Circuit, 4/4/84: Nope, not there, but the court did state “…we remand to the district court for an evidentiary hearing…relevant to the meaning of the October 2, 1975 (FBI) teletype…”

„  Evidentiary (Ballistics) hearing October, 1984, District Court decision 5/22/85: Nope, not there, but the Court did state “Because the October 2, 1975, teletype, evaluated in the context of the entire record, would not have affected the outcome of the trial, and does not create a reasonable doubt which did not otherwise exist…” and,  “Defendant had an independent firearms expert present in the courtroom at the hearing, but he was not called to testify.”

„ Appeal of hearing decision, Eighth Circuit, 9/11/86: Nope, not there. The Court did state, “When all is said and done, however, a few simple but very important facts remain. The casing introduced into evidence had in fact been extracted from the Wichita AR-15. This point was not disputed…” “Yet we are bound by the Bagley test requiring that we be convinced from a review of he entire record, that had the data and records withheld be made available, the jury probably would have reached a different result. We have not been so convinced.”

„ § 2255 Motion, based on “a change in the theory of the government’s case,” Eighth Circuit, 7/7/93: Nope, not there. The court did state, “Peltier’s arguments fail because their underlying premises are fatally flawed.”

„ Rule 35 Motion (second), Eighth Circuit, 12/18/02: Nope, not there. The Court did state, “In this case, a simple comparison of the sentences to the relevant statue reveals that the district court had the discretion to impose consecutive or concurrent sentences, and Mr. Peltier’s sentences are not therefore ‘illegal’ under Rule 35(a).”

„ Habeas Corpus: Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas (Leavenworth) to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, 11/4/03: Nope, not there either. The Court did state, “But whether the Parole Commission gave proper weight to this mitigating evidence is not a question we have the authority to review. Our only inquiry is whether the Commission was rational in concluding Mr. Peltier participated in the execution of two federal agents. On the record before us, we cannot say this determination was arbitrary and capricious.”

 And there are others, but by now even Peltier supporters should get the point. Or not.

Peltier supporters should (but are afraid) to ask Leonard where that allegedly damaging piece of information came from.

Peltier should provide some proof, anything of substance to support the claim—that the two agents had possessed a map that highlighted the Jumping bull Ranch & labeled the family’s storage cellars as “bunkers.”

Otherwise it’s just another lie destroying his shallow claims of innocence.

“In the Spirit of Coler and Williams”

Ed Woods

*Among those are the Cornish’s, Herten’s, Randolph’s, Robideau's, Ninham's, Swearingin’s, Neame’s, MeYFaN’s, Sampson’s, LaBlanc’s, Rawson’s, Liesner’s, Stabile’s, Savoy’s, Kosky, Ellison, Frodsham’s and the Wild Horse’s, the "wannabe's," and others who are exactly the kind of supporters Peltier wants and needs. Mouths open and wide-eyed, digesting all the folklore from the Peltier camp and never understanding the facts. Not bright enough, at times, to see the contradictions in Peltier’s fables and unquestionably not courageous enough to challenge him about them either.

** Please, Peltier supporters, watch the darn film Incident at Oglala will you?  It’s on the website for crying out loud. Just click on it for Pete’s sake, that’s what it’s there for, and watch Bob Robideau (1948-2009) yak on for two minutes and fifty-two seconds describing what is one of the biggest lies in the Peltier folklore. The next scene, (and watch Leonard’s eyes as they flit back and forth), and stumbles with an explanation after he pronounces, “This story is true.” It is as much a lie today as it ever was but Peltier supporters through blind indolence just don’t get it. 

"IN THE SPIRIT OF CRAZINESS" by Peter Matthiessen

Dear Supporters:

While preparing a previous Blog I once again picked up Peter Matthiessen’s, In the Spirit of Crazy Horse The story of Leonard Peltier and the FBI’s war on the American Indian Movement. This tome is the proverbial Bible, the touted bedrock of source material (along with the film, Incident at Oglala) by the LPDOC and a must read for anyone in Peltier’s camp. (My copy has been read at least a half-dozen times and referenced hundreds more. It’s dog-eared, with dozens of page markers, highlighted passages and marginal notes; it more resembles an old fringed pillow than a book at this point. It has been well examined.)

When I came across another familiar ITSOCH reference it begged for a formal reply.

Matthiessen was making the case for a new trial and supporting this he summarizes the defense issue surrounding the “Wichita AR-15” (trial Exhibit 34A) and the .223 shell casing found in the trunk of agent Coler’s vehicle (trial exhibit 34B). These were crucial pieces of Government evidence against Peltier. The AR-15 had been badly damaged when Robideau’s station wagon blew up on a Wichita Turnpike while he and others made their escape from Pine Ridge after the killings. The bolt mechanism, however, was functional and tested at the FBI’s Washington Laboratory in another similar weapon to determine if the “extractor” marks (those left on the ejected shell casing after the bullet is either fired or ejected) matched the casing from Agent Coler’s trunk. It did. The other essential step was to connect Peltier to this particular weapon at Jumping Bull and the point-blank murders of Agents Coler and Williams.

To support this premise Matthiessen states the following:

“The documents cited above are by no means the only ones that would justify an appeal for a new trial. Others cast light on the disputed contention between the damaged AR-15 rifle recovered from Robideau’s exploded station wagon on the Kansas Turnpike and the .223 shell casing allegedly found in the trunk of Coler’s car, which—keeping in mind that no evidence or testimony associated Peltier with that particular AR-15 in the first place and that even FBI expert Evan Hodge acknowledged that at least three AR-15s were involved in the shoot-out—represented the sum total of the ballistics evidence against him.” (p.484; Emphasis added)

Well, not quite.

So, we have two basic questions: Was there evidence or testimony connecting Peltier to this particular (essentially his) AR-15 at Jumping Bull? And did FBI firearms expert Evan Hodge testify that “at least three AR-15s were involved in the shoot-out?”

FBI Laboratory firearms expert, Special Agent Evan Hodge’s testimony at Peltier’s 1977 Fargo, ND trial is contained within 145 pages of trial transcript amounting to over 48,000 words.

It should come as no surprise that Agent Hodge never testified as Matthiessen claimed.

At no time does Agent Hodge make a statement in any manner that “at least three AR-15s” were involved at Jumping Bull. Defense attorney Lowe never posed that question to Hodge nor was it the subject of the many sidebar arguments before the Court. There was much direct and cross-examination of Hodge about a number of weapons and shell casings recovered both at Jumping Bull and other locations; none of which included another AR-15.

The closest these 145 pages of testimony came to the possible existence of any other AR-15s that day was the recovery of a total of fourteen, (two groups of seven), .223 shell casings (Lab items Q100-Q105, and Q130 located by the “green house” at Jumping Bull and Q2513-Q2519 located in the “tent city” area) that were eliminated as “not” being “extracted” from Peltier’s Wichita AR-15. (Trial Transcript 3323)

However, seven of those (Q100-105 and Q130) were identified as being military type ammunition and stamped with “LC” for “Lake City Arsenal,” a military manufacturer.  This is the same type ammunition issued to FBI agents and used after the shooting of Coler and Williams when other agents and law enforcement responded to Jumping Bull and engaged in fire-fight skirmishes as Peltier and others made their escape. (Trial transcript, 3320, 3384, 3389) In other words, the other AR-15s were brought there after the killings of Agents’ Coler and Williams—by FBI personnel.  

(Correctly so, that does not account for the other seven .223 shell casings, which were not further identified during Hodge’s testimony or during the trial; however, that still doesn’t negate Matthiessen’s error. These other casings may be the subject of a subsequent NPPA Blog.)

To make it absolutely clear, defense attorney Lowe never asked Agent Hodge whether there were “at least three (or any other number of) AR-15s” at Jumping Bull, nor did Agent Hodge testify to that effect.

However, as a finding of fact, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals concluded:

“When all is said and done, however, a few simple but very important facts remain: The casing introduced into evidence had in fact been extracted from the Wichita AR-15. This point was not disputed; although the defense had its own ballistics expert, it offered no contrary evidence.” (Eighth Circuit, September 11, 1986)

Thus, Matthiessen reinforces the folklore with just another erroneous myth of Peltier’s feigned innocence.

Also, contrary to Matthiessen’s claim, it was established during the trial and recognized by the Eighth Circuit Court that among the AIM participants during the shooting that morning Peltier was the only one with an AR-15, a weapon he was known to carry. (Eighth Circuit Court, September 11, 1986; see also NPPA Editorial Essay #55 Critical Witnesses against Peltier.)

(It would be fair to point out, yet again, that Matthiessen’s reporting was biased from the beginning because he was on Peltier’s payroll when doing his extensive research for the book. In exchange for full access to Peltier and the many others involved, Matthiessen had agreed to share the profits.)

HAVING IT BOTH WAYS:  It is reasonable for Peltier supporters to make an observation, or criticism, that the NPPA wants it both ways; at once attacking Matthiessen’s reporting and then using ITSOCH to provide proof of Peltier’s guilt.

But that wouldn’t be a fair criticism. Here we point out a deliberate falsehood…not just an error of fact or sloppy reporting from the trial transcript, but that Matthiessen was completely wrong: Possibly deliberately so. This is an entirely different scenario when, during the lengthy research for his book and his access to Peltier and many others, Matthiessen “quotes” Peltier and others. For an author to “quote” someone he has interviewed is more than merely significant, it provides first-hand proof.

That’s precisely why we can have it both ways, pinpointing Mathiessen’s errors of fact and then throwing at Peltier some of his own significant statements. And we are grateful to Matthiessen for providing perhaps the most critical quote from Peltier in the entire 600-plus pages of ITSOCH:

“I seen Joe when he pulled it out of the trunk and I looked at him when he put it on, and he gave me a smile.” (See July 8, 2012 Blog for complete details.)

And for that we thank Peter Matthiessen for helping everyone understand Peltier’s guilt beyond any doubt.

“In the Spirit of Coler and Williams”

Ed Woods

(P.S. All references are available on the No Parole Peltier website; the trial transcript is available on Peltier’s website, whoisleonardpeltier.info.)

Ronald A. Williams; Rest in Peace; July 30, 1947-June 26, 1975 (& Kuzma)

Dear Supporters:

Ron was robbed of his opportunity to reach his 65^th birthday and live a long, happy, productive and successful life. His chance meeting on a sultry morning at Jumping Bull and his bravery and heroic efforts to aid his critically wounded partner are a matter of record and FBI legend. Ron’s memorable sense of humor, charm, warm and outgoing personality, intelligence and dedication are acknowledged among those who had the privilege to personally have known and worked with him.

Our thoughts and prayers are with the entire Williams’ family. May he continue to rest-in-peace and be assured that his sacrifice in the line-of-duty will never be forgotten.

“In the Spirit of Coler and Williams”

Ed Woods

Postscript: At times like this we have never mentioned Peltier, this being the only exception when just days ago Peltier suffered yet another blow to his enduring frivolous lawsuits. A federal judge rejected the argument by Buffalo, New York attorney and Peltier apologist Michael Kuzma regarding Frank DeLuca (a.k.a Frank Black Horse) who was arrested with Peltier in Canada in 1976. Kuzma (albeit with Peltier and the LPDOC) in some perversely distorted way believe that FBI documents regarding this  “shadowy figure,” “may help vindicate Peltier.” As if all the evidence, all the many statements from Peltier himself will remove Peltier and his murderous actions at Jumping bull in 1975. Let’s remind Kuzma of Peltier’s only real alibi; that someone else killed the agents, someone they all knew, the fabricated Mr. X Peltier offered for many years and that his own cohort, Dino Butler publically said was a lie, and while his own biographer, Peter Matthiessen (In the Sprit of Crazy Horse, p.547) didn’t believe either. Or, Peltier’s own statement that “the person who was responsible for our arrest was the old man Yellow Bird who we learned later was paid for his work by he RCMP…” (ITSOCH p. 403). Perhaps, during those dark nights in Kuzma’s delusional paranoia DeLuca is on the grassy knoll in Dallas as well.  In a very parochial sense Kuzma is clogging the court system with fabrications that DeLuca, or anyone else for that matter, would minimize, or least of all, vindicate Peltier. 

NPPA Presentation

PELTIER: Great Start...Typical Finish: Stuntz & "Oglala Confrontation"

Dear Supporters:

On those rare occasions when Peltier says something constructive and positive it has been acknowledged.

Here, in his “Leonard Peltier 2012 Statement” he encourages people, especially the young and disenfranchised, to set personal goals to improve their condition and focus on both their heritage and future. To educate themselves and search for the knowledge that will bring them to understanding and living a better life. He properly warns of the dangers of yielding to boredom and a lack of direction with the debilitation of alcohol and drugs. His message is clear, concise and meaningful for all youths, especially Native Americans whose heritage was systematically robbed from them.

Peltier ends with this lesson; “…remember the sacrifices of those who lived and died for you. Remember Joe Stuntz…”

Yes, this is vintage Peltier. Really? Remember Joe Stuntz for helping Native American youth to connect with their heritage? Not quite.

Yes, Joe Stuntz (who Peltier speciously renamed “Killsright”), who stood over the mutilated bodies of two murdered human beings after he was one of the ones who shot at them to begin with, and then stealing a dead agent’s FBI raid jacket from the trunk of a bullet ridden vehicle. Stuntz, who wore that stolen jacket as he later fired on law enforcement responding to the aid of Jack Coler and Ron Williams (they had no way of knowing that it was already too late). And the same Joe Stuntz who was drilled in the forehead by a BIA officer, and thanks to Peltier, never left the Reservation alive that day. This is not made up; we know all this from Peltier himself “I seen Joe when he pulled it out of the trunk and I looked at him when he put it on, and he gave me a smile.”

Stuntz gives a “smile” yet. What a wonderful role model for Peltier to pick for Native American youth. Thankfully the vast majority of Native Americans, young and old, recognize how destructive Peltier and AIM was to any legitimate cause for equal rights and justice. But in his “prison setting” where the “…days go by oh so slowly,” and his nightmares are in his “waking moments,” it’s certain that any lucid moments, (like an otherwise good message to his dwindling followers), evaporates quickly into the remorseless personality Peltier has always had.

He did though, seemingly for the first time, introduce yet another fabrication into the lexicon of Peltier folklore, “Oglala Confrontation.”

“Confrontation?” Is that now what he wants to call it? Shooting and severely wounding two human beings and then destroying their faces at contact range: A confrontation? No, Leonard, and anyone who would listen to him, that wasn’t an argument, disagreement, quarrel, altercation or conflict, that’s what society calls, murder.

It would be compelling to suggest Peltier confront his own conscience, but that died a long time ago…if it ever existed at all. It will be better for him to try that line with The Creator when the time comes. The Creator won’t buy that sorry excuse either.

Peltier also said to the young who may listen “I hope and pray that none of the young people will ever end up in any prison situation.” Good advice.

Better advice: Don’t for a second believe that Peltier is a role model for anyone.

“In the Spirit of Coler and Williams”
Ed Woods

June 26, 1975: Peltier at New Orleans

June 26, 1975, Pine Ridge. Peltier at New Orleans, May 24, 2012:

Today marks thirty-seven years since the brutal murders of FBI Agents Jack R. Coler and Ronald A. Williams on the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation. Our thoughts and prayers remain with their families. We will continue to honor their memory and sacrifice in the line of duty.
New Orleans, May 24, 2012: Peltier didn’t appear at the FBI Headquarters in New Orleans, but at the gracious invitation of the retiring Special Agent in Charge, Ed Woods, the founder of the No Parole Peltier Association, provided an hour-long presentation at an all-employee conference. Covered were the facts surrounding the wounding and then cold-blooded murder of Agents Coler and Williams, the RESMURS (Reservation Murders) investigation, the conviction, and the sentencing and appeals of Leonard Peltier.
The greater part of the presentation was devoted to what Peltier has said over the past three and a half decades concerning his alleged innocence. Direct quotes from Peltier established for the audience Peltier’s unequivocal and remorseless guilt. It was pointed out that Peltier has only abused his Native American heritage; he has adulterated an otherwise proud American Indian history and tradition. This has been demonstrated by the regular turnover of Peltier committee leadership and his dwindling support. As recent as a few days ago they were again begging for money to support their “meager resources.”
And, maybe not so coincidentally, there has never been an accounting for any of the money Peltier has collected or the sham of his alleged charitable activities.
Native Americans have witnessed that the disruption caused by AIM and Peltier’s actions did nothing to improve their condition and they have distanced themselves from him and that past. Peltier only hopes that the uninformed continue to cling to the myth, as well as the folklore built on a mountain of fabrications, lies and unsupported alibis.
It is not difficult to understand the basic facts and get beyond Peltier and his dwindling network’s (LPDOC) fairy tales when Peltier’s own words make his guilt unambiguous; “And really, if necessary, I’d do it all over again, because it was the right thing to do.” 

Perhaps, twelve years from now, in July 2024, at his next parole hearing, we can convince Peltier otherwise.
“In the Spirit of Coler and Williams”
Ed Woods