Dear Supporters:
Ed Woods
and FBI Misconduct was publicly posted to the Internet on
October 6, 2012 by Leonard Peltier through his surrogate, the Leonard Peltier
Defense Offense Committee (LPDOC), as well as distributed to an email list.
Leonard Peltier is individually responsible for the
content of this posting which breaches the standard of slander and libel.
Aside from the slander and libel, this is actually
a compliment to the NPPA and an admission of failure by Peltier and the LPDOC.
Peltier unsuccessfully tries to tie together and
denigrate with disparate allegations that have no relevance, except to
demonstrate the success of the NPPA that Peltier is unable to refute the
folklore and myth that the NPPA website documents.
This writer will not spend the time discounting all the
voluminous errors of Peltier’s allegations, the vast majority of which relate
to unreliable, questionable and shallow sources.
A very
minor example being, Anthony J. Pellicano, who is serving fifteen
years for a combined 78 counts of criminal activity including wiretapping, racketeering and wire
fraud. He previously served time
for illegal weapons possession and was dumb enough to act as his own attorney
at one trial. Pellicano is due to get out on his birthday in 2019 from the
Federal Prison in Big Spring, Texas. A
fabulous source for sure. And this doesn’t even scratch the surface.
Each time Peltier and the LPDOC repeat a myth or
promotes a new one, or misstates the facts, the NPPA challenges and corrects
those statements with verifiable facts and findings, documenting them with
identifiable sources such as: the court records and trial transcripts,
Mathiessen’s, “In the Spirit of Crazy Horse, Peltier’s, “Prison Writings,”
Miramax’s “Incident at Oglala,” whoisleonardpeltier.info, and most
significantly, co-conspirators, Bob Robideau and Dino Butler, and of course to
a great extent, Leonard Peltier himself.
Peltier’s and the LPDOC’s approach remains to segue
from the facts, remain unresponsive to challenges to prove any aspect of Peltier’s
claims of innocence and to cower when a direct challenge has been lodged
against them.
The LPDOC has been uniquely unsuccessful in
maintaining either its management and leadership network or a posse of
consistently loyal supporters; hence, the constant cry for more funds, which
still have never been accounted for.
The end result of this rare attack will have effect
only on those few remaining supporters who cannot see beyond the myth or are
unwilling or unable to explore and understand the facts. But these are exactly
the kind of followers Peltier needs and wants.
“In the Spirit of Coler and Williams”
Ed Woods
